chinu
11-07 07:29 PM
Hi All,
My employer is going put one newspapaer ad for two employee's. He is doing this to save moeny. Is this ok to put one ad for two employee's? Will there be any probelm in PERM.
Thank you.
Chinu
My employer is going put one newspapaer ad for two employee's. He is doing this to save moeny. Is this ok to put one ad for two employee's? Will there be any probelm in PERM.
Thank you.
Chinu
wallpaper %IMG_DESC_1%
webm
04-17 04:29 PM
Nope,nothing as such going on for EAD new/renewals...
ashishgour
10-25 06:07 PM
Hope this bill helps us !!!:confused:
http://www.immigration-law.com/
http://www.immigration-law.com/
2011 %IMG_DESC_2%
paskal
03-01 01:14 PM
Please help reactivate this group. We have 27 members on our group but it's hard to get 1 reply. We have successfully met two lawmakers recently and more such contacts are urgently needed. A mail was sent out to the group today. If you do not get it, check your junk/spam folders and make sure the group id is added to your safe list. Folks, this time we do not want to come up short. Let's not be in a position to regret our failings in hindsight.
more...
tonyHK12
12-16 10:42 PM
Bill HR 4853 Passed the house. It has already cleared the Senate.
Expect most people to see an increase of $100-200/month in their pay check!
D-Pomeroy's amendment for estate tax failed earlier.
Now work can progress on the other Bills in lame duck.
Expect most people to see an increase of $100-200/month in their pay check!
D-Pomeroy's amendment for estate tax failed earlier.
Now work can progress on the other Bills in lame duck.
askreddy
08-06 08:14 PM
Hi
Me and my family are travelling to India . Iam booking tickets and we may be passing thru these below countries. Pls let us know if transit visa is required. We don't have visa have only AP.
I gone thru other threads, Pls let me know what I understood is correct.
US to India
-------------
Via DUBAI - transit visa required - NO
Via Frankfurt - transit visa required - NO
Via Amsterdam - transit visa required. - NO
Via Paris - transit visa required. - YES
India to US
-------------
Via DUBAI - transit visa required - NO
Via Frankfurt - transit visa required - ?????
Via Amsterdam - transit visa required. - NO
Via Paris - transit visa required. - YES
Thanks
Sree
Me and my family are travelling to India . Iam booking tickets and we may be passing thru these below countries. Pls let us know if transit visa is required. We don't have visa have only AP.
I gone thru other threads, Pls let me know what I understood is correct.
US to India
-------------
Via DUBAI - transit visa required - NO
Via Frankfurt - transit visa required - NO
Via Amsterdam - transit visa required. - NO
Via Paris - transit visa required. - YES
India to US
-------------
Via DUBAI - transit visa required - NO
Via Frankfurt - transit visa required - ?????
Via Amsterdam - transit visa required. - NO
Via Paris - transit visa required. - YES
Thanks
Sree
more...
eb3_nepa
09-14 10:07 PM
Hi,
I see a LOT of the same questions being posted over and over again. (eg. H1b Transfer, Eb3 to Eb2 etc). I also see that the Questions answered by the lawyer are quite hard to access and the info about the next call etc is also quite hard to get to.
How about we bring the 2 worlds together. We have a Menu Item on the Left saying either "FAQ's about immigration" or "Q/A from lawyers" etc. and somewhere on the homepage plus in the forums section we put some text saying "Before posting please check out the answers from lawyers" and put a link to the same.
Along with that (if possible), we also put all the questions and how many have been answered and which ones are going to be answered.
I see a LOT of the same questions being posted over and over again. (eg. H1b Transfer, Eb3 to Eb2 etc). I also see that the Questions answered by the lawyer are quite hard to access and the info about the next call etc is also quite hard to get to.
How about we bring the 2 worlds together. We have a Menu Item on the Left saying either "FAQ's about immigration" or "Q/A from lawyers" etc. and somewhere on the homepage plus in the forums section we put some text saying "Before posting please check out the answers from lawyers" and put a link to the same.
Along with that (if possible), we also put all the questions and how many have been answered and which ones are going to be answered.
2010 %IMG_DESC_3%
test101
07-10 10:09 AM
or it's something not going to be done? we need to work on this
more...
Macaca
03-11 06:42 PM
Some paras from Securing Iraq Votes, One at a Time (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/10/AR2007031001300.html) -- House Democratic Leaders Methodically Build Support for War Plan
By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sunday, March 11, 2007
Rep. Jerry Nadler was the only lawmaker at a meeting of all House Democrats on Thursday to stand up and declare that he could not support a compromise plan to fund the Iraq war with a timeline to end the conflict. So some party leaders had written him off even as he joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a private meeting.
In the confines of the speaker's suite, Nadler (N.Y.) could be specific. He sought assurances from Pelosi (Calif.) that President Bush would be compelled to withdraw all troops from combat by August 2008, as the legislation proposed. He wanted to know: "What is the legal compulsion to follow this timeline?"
A Pelosi aide disappeared from the meeting for a few minutes and returned with a few lines of legislative text offering what Nadler wanted to hear: Once troops are out of Iraq, no money would be available to put them back in, outside the narrow exceptions of targeted counterterrorism operations, embassy protection and efforts to train Iraqis.
"You know," Nadler said after a pause, "I think that's okay."
Nadler's conversion was a sign of the member-by-member, slow but deliberate headway Democratic leaders say they are making in their efforts to cobble together the 218 supporters they need to pass one of the most consequential pieces of defense legislation in decades, a $105 billion war-funding bill that would impose strict standards of rest and readiness for the military, establish clear benchmarks for the government of Iraq and set a timeline to end U.S. involvement in the war.
Through closed-door meetings, pep rallies, private phone conversations and horse trading, Democratic leaders are moving outward from the 180 solid votes in the party's political center to win the votes on the party's left and right that will be needed to pass the bill later this month.
The cajoling will continue tomorrow as lawmakers return to Washington and the legislation is readied for markup later in the week. But there are roadblocks: Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said some conservatives are withholding their support until the language McDermott wanted is removed.
As Democratic leaders balance those demands, the calculus is fairly straightforward, said one conservative Democrat involved in the process. Leaders are counting on winning all but a dozen of the 43 conservative Blue Dog Democrats and all but a dozen of the 75 or so members of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus. Then, Democratic leaders are hoping, enough Republicans will break ranks to put them over the top.
By last week's end, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said, they had secured about 200 votes.
But the last 18 votes will not be easy. That point was brought home Thursday morning, during the closed-door meeting in which the legislation was detailed for Democratic members. As Pelosi gave her pitch, Reps. Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (Tex.) and Nadler stood up to leave for a news conference of their own. After an uncomfortable pause, Pelosi growled that she wished Democrats would be courteous enough to hear her out before talking to the media. Nadler sat down. The rest walked out.
Democratic aides concede that some party members, including Woolsey, Lee and Doggett, are all but lost. But they are not giving up.
"There's nothing guaranteed in life, but I feel very good," Emanuel said.
By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sunday, March 11, 2007
Rep. Jerry Nadler was the only lawmaker at a meeting of all House Democrats on Thursday to stand up and declare that he could not support a compromise plan to fund the Iraq war with a timeline to end the conflict. So some party leaders had written him off even as he joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a private meeting.
In the confines of the speaker's suite, Nadler (N.Y.) could be specific. He sought assurances from Pelosi (Calif.) that President Bush would be compelled to withdraw all troops from combat by August 2008, as the legislation proposed. He wanted to know: "What is the legal compulsion to follow this timeline?"
A Pelosi aide disappeared from the meeting for a few minutes and returned with a few lines of legislative text offering what Nadler wanted to hear: Once troops are out of Iraq, no money would be available to put them back in, outside the narrow exceptions of targeted counterterrorism operations, embassy protection and efforts to train Iraqis.
"You know," Nadler said after a pause, "I think that's okay."
Nadler's conversion was a sign of the member-by-member, slow but deliberate headway Democratic leaders say they are making in their efforts to cobble together the 218 supporters they need to pass one of the most consequential pieces of defense legislation in decades, a $105 billion war-funding bill that would impose strict standards of rest and readiness for the military, establish clear benchmarks for the government of Iraq and set a timeline to end U.S. involvement in the war.
Through closed-door meetings, pep rallies, private phone conversations and horse trading, Democratic leaders are moving outward from the 180 solid votes in the party's political center to win the votes on the party's left and right that will be needed to pass the bill later this month.
The cajoling will continue tomorrow as lawmakers return to Washington and the legislation is readied for markup later in the week. But there are roadblocks: Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said some conservatives are withholding their support until the language McDermott wanted is removed.
As Democratic leaders balance those demands, the calculus is fairly straightforward, said one conservative Democrat involved in the process. Leaders are counting on winning all but a dozen of the 43 conservative Blue Dog Democrats and all but a dozen of the 75 or so members of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus. Then, Democratic leaders are hoping, enough Republicans will break ranks to put them over the top.
By last week's end, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said, they had secured about 200 votes.
But the last 18 votes will not be easy. That point was brought home Thursday morning, during the closed-door meeting in which the legislation was detailed for Democratic members. As Pelosi gave her pitch, Reps. Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (Tex.) and Nadler stood up to leave for a news conference of their own. After an uncomfortable pause, Pelosi growled that she wished Democrats would be courteous enough to hear her out before talking to the media. Nadler sat down. The rest walked out.
Democratic aides concede that some party members, including Woolsey, Lee and Doggett, are all but lost. But they are not giving up.
"There's nothing guaranteed in life, but I feel very good," Emanuel said.
hair %IMG_DESC_4%
chanduv23
11-09 02:57 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyonWObr9j4
CyonWObr9j4
CyonWObr9j4
more...
Steve Mitchell
December 12th, 2003, 05:08 PM
Welcome to Dphoto...definitely a gorgeous shade of green. We look forward to seeing more pix as well. Make sure to use the Forum Members Gallery...you are already registered there as well as the Member Reviews area. BTW, love your username. Coffee is my blood.
hot %IMG_DESC_5%
amitjoey
05-06 12:09 PM
I believe it is Page 8
http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-765instr.pdf
http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-765instr.pdf
more...
house %IMG_DESC_17%
JeffDG
03-23 07:40 PM
Approved i-140
tattoo %IMG_DESC_6%
PDOCT05
08-28 09:19 AM
Has anyone that sent his/her July I485 application to NSC and expect this application to have been transfered to TSC, received a receipt?
Check this thread you will find several..,
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=11813
Check this thread you will find several..,
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=11813
more...
pictures %IMG_DESC_7%
chris.garrett
04-24 01:35 PM
New user, but here you go.
dresses %IMG_DESC_12%
vivache
09-28 12:51 AM
Need to fill the I-134 for my mother in law and father in law
Does one form suffice .. or do I need to fill two forms?
thanks
Does one form suffice .. or do I need to fill two forms?
thanks
more...
makeup %IMG_DESC_9%
tom
06-18 03:14 PM
.
girlfriend %IMG_DESC_14%
I485user
12-13 02:35 PM
All,
I'm a EB2 filer and PD is 2003. We did a concurrent filing on Jul 2nd, received receipt notices for the same, FP Completed and EAD approved.
I see the A NUMBER printed on my 140 and 485 receipt notices. I wanted to understand whether the 'A' number mentioned on the receipt notices is the VISA number or, the VISA number is something different that gets assigned during the adjudication of I485 based on the availability.
Trying to assess the impact of EB2 retrogression on cases that are already filed and Finger printing is complete.
Please Advise.
I'm a EB2 filer and PD is 2003. We did a concurrent filing on Jul 2nd, received receipt notices for the same, FP Completed and EAD approved.
I see the A NUMBER printed on my 140 and 485 receipt notices. I wanted to understand whether the 'A' number mentioned on the receipt notices is the VISA number or, the VISA number is something different that gets assigned during the adjudication of I485 based on the availability.
Trying to assess the impact of EB2 retrogression on cases that are already filed and Finger printing is complete.
Please Advise.
hairstyles %IMG_DESC_11%
jthomas
05-31 01:51 AM
....
Blog Feeds
04-23 11:32 AM
The Technology section of the New York Times (http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/googles-immigration-fixer/?partner=rss&emc=rss) this week ran an article about an employee at Google whose job it is to "fix" problems Google employees have with the immigration system. The article is interesting, but what is really striking is the tone of the comments to the online article. There is a display of real anger at Google's hiring of foreign workers in this time of economic hardship - when so many U.S. citizens are looking for work. Read the article. What's your opinion?
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/ZMPzfrVU0ow/)
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/ZMPzfrVU0ow/)
rakesh05
02-26 04:11 PM
Hi,
I am currently on H1 and it is with company A. I have an offer with company B and want to get my H1 transferred to company B. I have not gotten my H1 stamped since i have received my work authorization. Can i still get my H1 transferred or do i need to get it stamped and only then can i have my H1 transferred.
Thanks in advance.
I am currently on H1 and it is with company A. I have an offer with company B and want to get my H1 transferred to company B. I have not gotten my H1 stamped since i have received my work authorization. Can i still get my H1 transferred or do i need to get it stamped and only then can i have my H1 transferred.
Thanks in advance.
No comments:
Post a Comment